Let's assume engine is built to handle whatever power you throw at it... I was asking if the blower itself can handle it
2.95” pulley with imt charged air cooler compared with the 3.6 pulley uncooled from last year. I used the mustang dyno setting since it lines up perfectly with the numbers I put down on my local Dynojet on 3.6 pulley which the shop owner says reads pretty low compared to the other dynos in town.
Looks good. Torque curve is nice and flat. Looks like ambient temp was much higher on the 2.95" pulley. I'm sure the car will feel even better in the cooler temps.
Did you retune for the smaller pulley? Afr is a bit more lean compared to the 3.6" run.
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
I retuned for E-40 which according to my tuner can run more lean without risk of detonation.
Does anyone have a stock or fbo datalog of a 3rd gear wot for a e-dyno comparison? I was super excited to do a comparison from before the blower, then overlay it with a 3.6 and 2.95 but can’t find my stock datalog anywhere.
2.95 is still right around 12:1 which is usually where you want it. Definitely would have tried to bring that area around 3000 RPM down, but if she ain't knocking it's all good.
2013 RR Si Sedan - Modified RSX/8th gen CT-E supercharger and 2.25" IMT aftercooler